| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Which hand would you prefer? |
| ACES |
|
43% |
[ 14 ] |
| KINGS |
|
56% |
[ 18 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 32 |
|
| Author |
Message |
cctv The Nuts


Joined: 16 Dec 2006 Posts: 17474 Location: blackpool/cleveleys
|
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 12:54 am Post subject: Which hand would you prefer? |
|
|
Which hand would you prefer? Without looking at a poker calculator.
ACES VS KINGS
VS .
Flop .
Pick wisely its closer than you think. _________________ the star of cctv will be watching you! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ste The Dealer


Joined: 25 Jan 2007 Posts: 3667 Location: Fleetwood
|
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kings on this as you have a chance of flush draw, but my chips have been all in before the flop with either of those hands!! _________________ Brighten up your forum posts with poker playing cards!
http://www.stevedawson.com/poker-hands.php |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheSAS Royal Flush


Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Posts: 3162 Location: Liverpool
|
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
I voted for aces because if the Kings don't hit, I would have the pot won. A bird in the hand and all that........... _________________ May all your cards be live and your pots be monsters! Mike Sexton.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LokStok Straight

Joined: 28 Oct 2005 Posts: 1033 Location: Wolverhampton
|
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 12:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm voting aces .. but I wouldn't be disheartened if I had the Kings in that scenario .. _________________ Do you have a cardroom or office that needs unique decoration?
MakeOver UPVC : Making Plants Fashionable |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
REDROCK Ace High


Joined: 20 Jun 2006 Posts: 49 Location: West Yorkshire
|
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 14 outs make the Kings slight favourites to win, but if It was me staring at that table I'd rather be holding the Aces. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spoona999 One Pair

Joined: 19 Mar 2007 Posts: 145 Location: Newcastle
|
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 1:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| would aces stil be slight fav if the kings had 14 outs? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spoona999 One Pair

Joined: 19 Mar 2007 Posts: 145 Location: Newcastle
|
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 1:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
oops no my mistakes...kings are slight fav  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DJam Straight


Joined: 28 Mar 2006 Posts: 960 Location: Madchestahh! (Said with an exaggerated Manc accent, even though I don't actually talk like that)
|
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yup without cheating I voted kings. Simple maths. _________________ Say to playing on tilt |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Emma_Yeah Three of a Kind

Joined: 02 Mar 2008 Posts: 733 Location: Hull
|
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kings have 14 outs? and aces have the rest of the deck |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tracy111 Two Pair


Joined: 02 Oct 2007 Posts: 426 Location: Dalton-in-Furness
|
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 10:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I,d go with K K coz theres a flush and str8 draw.
If I had the A A and K K went all in I would be tempted to call but probably fold coz of the flush draw. (the A isn't suited)
I know nothing about how many outs i had, but defo know when i'm ahead |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JonThomson Royal Flush


Joined: 20 Oct 2005 Posts: 3243 Location: FTP
|
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
14 out draw is favourite if we get everything in here, so kings _________________ Jon Thomson
Pushing trash and rivering donkeys since 1982
"Expected Value is the term bad poker players use whenever they lose a big hand. The term comes from economics, and therefore it only exists in theory." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DJam Straight


Joined: 28 Mar 2006 Posts: 960 Location: Madchestahh! (Said with an exaggerated Manc accent, even though I don't actually talk like that)
|
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 10:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Emma_Yeah wrote: | | kings have 14 outs? and aces have the rest of the deck |
Ah but the flaw in that logic is that aces have to hit the rest of the deck twice, whilst kings only have to hit their outs once out of two attempts (obv not 100% true as there's some slight redraws but good enough to explain why the aces don't simply have 31 outs). _________________ Say to playing on tilt |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Emma_Yeah Three of a Kind

Joined: 02 Mar 2008 Posts: 733 Location: Hull
|
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 12:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| lol very true djam |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gnashers Full House


Joined: 13 May 2005 Posts: 1577 Location: lytham st. annes
|
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 1:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| i'll have the kings cos if i had the aces on that board, id be passing to any decent bet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BloodyJonny Ace High


Joined: 30 Jul 2008 Posts: 10 Location: Midlands
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 10:48 am Post subject: Re: Which hand would you prefer? |
|
|
| cctv wrote: | Which hand would you prefer? Without looking at a poker calculator.
ACES VS KINGS
VS .
Flop .
Pick wisely its closer than you think. |
I go with the Kings.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The-Tower The Nuts


Joined: 17 May 2005 Posts: 9707 Location: anywhere, as long as i can film it!!
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
9 clubs, 4 tens, 2 kings... 15 cards If thats right..
If its a full ring then..
10x2=20(hole cards)
3 burn cards
5 community cards...
52-28=24
so 15 cards to hit out of 24 remaining cards.....
even tho I never go all-in and I'm behind, i would vote Kings...But then again I like the aces cos the kings do have to hit.. _________________ I am The Tower........ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JonThomson Royal Flush


Joined: 20 Oct 2005 Posts: 3243 Location: FTP
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 1:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| the-tower wrote: | | 9 clubs, 4 tens, 2 kings... 15 cards If thats right.. |
double counting the ten of clubs are we?
| Quote: | If its a full ring then..
10x2=20(hole cards)
3 burn cards
5 community cards...
52-28=24
so 15 cards to hit out of 24 remaining cards..... |
wat _________________ Jon Thomson
Pushing trash and rivering donkeys since 1982
"Expected Value is the term bad poker players use whenever they lose a big hand. The term comes from economics, and therefore it only exists in theory." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The-Tower The Nuts


Joined: 17 May 2005 Posts: 9707 Location: anywhere, as long as i can film it!!
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 1:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
oh yeah...
glad im no expert _________________ I am The Tower........ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DJam Straight


Joined: 28 Mar 2006 Posts: 960 Location: Madchestahh! (Said with an exaggerated Manc accent, even though I don't actually talk like that)
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tower, you can't discount burn cards and other players' hole cards... all unknowns have to be included. Otherwise you might as well just say it depends on the two remaining cards to come and then you'd have a 100% certainty on the outcome. _________________ Say to playing on tilt |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The-Tower The Nuts


Joined: 17 May 2005 Posts: 9707 Location: anywhere, as long as i can film it!!
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yeah i realise that now....
I still like the kings, but heart says aces... funny one hey _________________ I am The Tower........ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|